TUMULTUOUS
1960s
Interpreting
Primary Sources
Civil Rights
The separate
but equal doctrine has failed in three important respects. First it is inconsistent with the
fundamental equalitarianism of the American way of life in that it marks groups
with the brand of inferior status.
Secondly, where it has been followed, the results have been separate and
unequal facilities for minority peoples.
Finally, it has kept people apart despite incontrovertible evidence that
an environment favorable to civil
rights is fostered whenever groups are permitted to live and work together.
--President's
Committee on Civil Rights, 1947
The New Left
Loneliness,
estrangement, isolation describe the vast distance between man and man
today....We would replace power rooted in possession, privilege, or
circumstance by power and uniqueness rooted in love, reflectiveness, reason and
creativity. As a social system we seek
the establishment of a democracy of individual participation, governed by two
central aims: that the individual share in those social decisions determining
the quality and direction of his life; that society be organized to encourage independence
in men and provide the media for their common participation.
--Port Huron
Statement of Students for a Democratic Society, 1962
Women's
Liberation
We reject
the current assumption that a man must carry the sole burden of supporting
himself, his wife, and family, and that a woman is automatically entitled to
lifelong support by a man upon her marriage, or that marriage, home and family
are primarily woman's world and responsibility--hers, to dominate--his to
support. We believe that a true partnership
between the sexes demands a different concept of marriage, an equitable sharing
of the responsibilities of home and children and of the economic burdens of
their support....
In the
interests of the human dignity of women, we will protest and endeavor to change
the false image of women now prevalent in the mass media, and in the texts,
ceremonies, laws, and practices of the major social institutions. Such images perpetuate contempt for women by
society and by women for themselves.
--National
Organization for Women's Statement of Purpose, 1966
Section
1. Equality of rights under the law
shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account
of sex.
--Equal
Rights Amendment
Questions
to think about:
1. Examine the origins of the struggles of
blacks, students, and women for equal rights.
What factors contributed to growing radicalization of these groups
during the 1960s?
2. Which strategy--court battles, non-violent
protest, or violent confrontation--was most effective in bringing about social
change?
3. What do you think was the major goal of the
struggles of blacks, students, and women for equal rights--a transformation of
American society or equal participation within the existing order?
American
Foreign Policy
Why are we
in South Vietnam? We are there because
we have a promise to keep. Since 1954
every American President has offered support to the people of South
Vietnam....We have made a national pledge to help South Vietnam defend its
independence. And I intend to keep our
promise....
We are also
there to strengthen world order. Around
the globe, from Berlin to Thailand, are people whose well-being rests, in part,
on the belief that they can count on us if they are attacked. To leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the
confidence of all these people in the value of American commitment, the value
of America's word. The result would be
increased unrest and instability, and even wider war.
We are also
there because there are great stakes in the balance. Let no one think for a moment that retreat from Vietnam would
being an end to conflict. The battle
would be renewed in one country and then another. The central lesson of our time is that the appetite of aggression
is never
satisfied.
--President
Johnson defends the American role in Vietnam, 1965
Because we
are free we can never be indifferent to the fate of freedom elsewhere. Our moral sense dictates a clearcut
preference for those societies, which share with us an abiding respect for
individual human rights....Our commitment to human rights must be absolute.
--President
Carter, 1977
Through the
1950s and on into the 1960s our national security was coupled with a sense of
national unity and purpose. But that
changed. The Soviet Union has now forged
ahead in producing nuclear and conventional weapons....Let us not be satisfied
with a foreign policy whose principal accomplishment seems to be our
acquisition of the right to sell Pepsi-Cola in Siberia. It is time that we, the people of the United
States, demand a policy that puts our own nation's interests as the first
priority....Our foreign policy in recent years seems to be a matter of
placating potential adversaries. Does
our government fear that the American people lack willpower?
--Ronald Reagan,
1976
Questions
to think about:
1. Why did the United States intervene in
Vietnam according to President Johnson?
2. Were vital American interests at stake in
the Vietnam War?
3. On what grounds did anti-war critics protest
American involvement in Vietnam?
4. Are American interests best served by a
foreign policy emphasizing human rights or a policy emphasizing more concrete
national interests?
5. Should the United States conduct its foreign
policy unilaterally or through multilateral organizations?
STUDY AID:
GREAT SOCIETY LEGISLATION
1964 24th
Amendment Banned poll tax in
federal elections
Civil
Rights Act Banned
discrimination in public accommodations and
employment
Urban
Mass Transportation Act Provided financial aid for urban mass
transit systems
Economic
Opportunity Act Authorized the Job Corps and
VISTA
Wilderness
Preservation Act Barred
commercial use in 9.1 million acres of national
forest
1965 Elementary
and Secondary Provided $1.3 billion in aid to
schools
School
Act
Medicare Provided medical aid for the elderly
Voting
Rights Act Forbade literacy tests and other voting restrictions
Omnibus
Housing Act Provided rent supplements to low income
families
Department
of Housing and
Urban
Development
National
Endowment for the Arts Provided
federal assistance to the arts
Water
Quality Act Required states to establish and
enforce water quality
standards
Immigration
reform laws
Air
Quality Act
Higher
Education Act Provided federal scholarships
1966 National
Traffic and Motor Vehicle Sets federal
safety standards
Safety
Act
Highway
Safety Act
Department
of Transportation
Model
Cities Rehabilitated
slums
INTERPRETING
STATISTICS: THE CIVIL RIGHTS REVOLUTION
African
American Voter Registration Before and After Voting Rights Act of 1965
1960 1966 Percent
Increase
Alabama 66,000
250,000 278.8
Arkansas 73,000
115,000 57.5
Florida 183,000 303,000 65.6
Georgia 180,000 300,000 66.7
Louisiana 159,000 243,000 52.8
Mississippi 22,000
175,000 695.4
North
Carolina 210,000 282,000 34.3
South
Carolina 58,000 191,000 229.3
Tennessee 185,000 225,000 21.6
Texas 227,000 400,000 76.2
Virginia 100,000 205,000 105.0
Questions
to think about:
1. What difference did the Voting Rights Act
make in black voter participation?
2. In which states was the impact greatest?
Median
Income of Families by Race
Ratio of
Non-white to White Incomes
1939 37 percent
1950 54
1955 55
1960 55
1965 55
1970 64
1975 65
1980 58
African
American Family Incomes, 1947 and 1974
(in 1974
dollars)
1947 1974
Less than
$3,000 42 14
$3,000 to
$6,999 41 31
$7,000 to
$9,999 9 16
$10,000 and
more 8 38
Employment
as Professional, Managerial, Technical, or Administrative Workers
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980
Black males 3 4 5 8 20
White males 17 19 23 25 32
Black
females 5 7 8 11 20
White
females 19 18 17 19 25
Percentage
of Families at Various Income Levels by Ethnicity, 1980
Black Hispanic White
$25,000+ 20 23 42
$15,000-25,000 23 26 28
$
7,500-15,000 27 29 20
$
0-7,500 30 22 10
Years of
Schooling
Blacks Whites
1950 6.8
9.3
1981 12.1 12.6
Proportion
of Americans 25-29 Completing High School
All Americans African Americans
1940 38.1 11.6
1950 52.8 22.2
1960 60.7 37.7
1970 73.8 55.4
1980 84.5 75.2
Percentage
with four or more years of college
Blacks Whites
1950 2.1 6.2
1981 8.2 17.8
Proportion
of Families Below the Poverty Level
All
Americans African Americans
1959 18.5 48.1
1965 11.8 35.5
1971 10.0 28.8
1976 9.4
27.9
1981 11.2 30.8
Questions to
think about:
1. Compare black and white income distributions
and educational attainment over time.
2. Which changes offer evidence of
improvement? Which statistics indicate
little improvement?
INTERPRETING
STATISTICS: THE VIETNAM WAR
U.S.
Troop Levels in Vietnam
1960 900
1961 3,200
1962 11,300
1963 16,300
1964 23,300
1965 184,300
1966 385,300
1967 485,600
1968 536,100
1969 475,200
1970 334,600
1971 156,800
1972 24,200
Question
to think about:
1. When did the American troop commitment
increase most rapidly?
2. When did the American troop commitment begin
to decline?
INTERPRETING
STATISTICS: AMERICA IN OUR TIME
Consumer
Price Index
Price
Increase
1972 2 percent
1974 8 percent
1976 5 percent
1978 8 percent
1980 12
percent
1982 4 percent
1984 4 percent
Consumer
Prices, 1967
3-bedroom
house $17,000
New Cadillac
converible de Ville $6,700
New
Volkswagon $1,497
5-ounce tube
of Crest toothpaste 39 cents
Sirloin
steak 89 cents a pound
Hershey
chocolate bar 5 cents
Regular
gasoline 34 cents a gallon
Portable
typewriter $39
Transistor
radio $14
Man's gray
flannel suit $69
Black and
white TV set $79
Questions
to think about:
1. How have prices changed since 1967? Are
increases greatest, in your view, in luxuries or in necessities?
2. What factors have contributed to increased
price levels?
Automobile
Imports
Proportion of Auto Market Held by
Foreign Manufacturers
1946-50 0.2
1961-65 6.1
1966-70 10.6
1971-75 15.2
1976-80 20.1
Questions
to think about:
1. When did automobile imports increase most
rapidly?
2. Why, in your view, did automobile imports
increase?
The Changing
Family
1960
1980
Married
couples 75 percent 55
with children 44 48
without children 33 27
Female
heads 17 29
with children 3 22
without children 14 7
Lone male
head 8 16
with children 1 1
without children 7 15
Questions
to think about:
1. In what ways have American families changed
since 1960?
2. In what ways, in your view, are families
better off today than they were a generation ago? worse off?
Percentage
of women in the labor force
Single Married,
Husband Present
1940 48 15
1960 44 31
1981 62 51
Questions
to think about:
1. Why did the number of women working for pay
increase since 1940?
2. How has the increase in women’s employment
altered family life and the nature of the workplace?
Proportion
of Labor Force Employed in Activities Other than Making Food or Goods
1900 27
percent
1920 33
1940 44
1960 55
1984 70
Questions
to think about:
1. Describe the fundamental ways that the
nature of work has changed over the course of the 20th century?
2. What kinds of work do people do if they do
not make food or goods?
Distribution
of Wealth and Income 1980
Top
Fifth Middle Fifth Bottom Fifth
Wealth
76 percent 6 0
Income
42 18 5
Families at
Various Income Levels, 1980
$50,000+ 7 percent
$25,000-50,000 33
$15,000-25,000 28
$10,000-15,000 14
$ 5,000-10,000 13
$ 0-5,000 6
Ethnic
Composition of the U.S., 1980
German-Austrian 19 percent
English-Scottish 17
African 12
Irish 11
Hispanic 7
Italian 6
Scandinavian 6
U.S.
Population Statistics
Year Population Median Age Year Population Median Age
1790 3,929,000 15.9 1890 63,056,000 22.0
1800 5,297,000 16 1900 76,094,000 22.9
1810 7,224,000 16 1910 92,407,000 24.1
1820 9,618,000 16.7 1920 106,466,000 25.3
1830 12,901,000 17.2 1930 123,188,000 26.5
1840 17,120,000 17.8 1940 132,122,000 29.0
1850 23,261,000 18.9 1950 151,683,000 30.2
1860 31,513,000 19.4 1960 180,671,000 29.5
1870 39,905,000 20.2 1970 204,879,000 28.1
1880 50,262,000 20.9